Jump Past Navigation
OrbitAccess Home Page Report on Web Accessibility of the Presidential Candidate Sites
Images of the Candidate Sites in Netscape
Images of the Candidate Sites in Lynx
The Candidate Sites as Evaluated by Bobby
Images of the Candidate Sites in Palm V
The Candidate Sites Read by Home Page Reader
On-Line Resources in Web Accessibility

Web Accessibility of the Presidential Candidate Sites, December 9, 1999

Technical Note


Programmers, webmasters, and markup experts visiting this site may wish for a detailed, line-by-line analysis of the candidates' pages. Advocates for the disabled may wish for more advocacy from us. Others may wonder why we chose Netscape Navigator or ProxiWeb for our analysis.

Our purpose at OrbitAccess is to look for a range of pitfalls using typical situations. We are interested in keeping the Web accessible to all, including to people who have slow connections in locations without the latest graphical browser. Our only advocacy is access for people through their devices and browsers of choice.

For example, there is no point in hunting for invalid HTML where browsers handle common errors or deprecated markup. Nor do we expect accessibility perfection. On this site, we chose to keep our graphical buttons at the top of the page -- meaning speech readers will repeat the ALT text every time. We didn't implement an HTML shortcut key for these because it might conflict with the speech reader's shortcut keys. On the other hand, our small script deprecates nicely, and our single line of CSS replaces dangerous table layout, incorrect <blockquote> or <ul>, or deadly transparent spacer bar GIFs.

Everything is changing and 100% accessibility is impossible -- one has to have a computer, after all, and some sort of Internet connection and software to start with!

But the point is awareness of the issues. To that end, we used the following typical setups:


OrbitAccess Home Page | Report Index | Previous: Resources | candidate@orbitaccess.com